RockForums.net: Deaf vs Blind - RockForums.net

Jump to content

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Deaf vs Blind which would you rather be Rate Topic: -----

Poll: choose (14 member(s) have cast votes)

choose

  1. deaf (9 votes [64.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.29%

  2. blind (5 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 User is offline   where_i'm_calling_from Icon

  • Ed Skywalker
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member+
  • Posts: 3,034
  • Joined: 27-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newcastle
  • Interests:cake and angra.
  • Fave artist:Kate Bush (what a legend)

Posted 05 September 2005 - 07:21 PM

no that exists because you get extra time in exams. i think the concept of extra time in exams for being "disabled" is ridiculous, as if it helps a retard get a good grade they couldn't normally have achieved, then it tells employers that this kid is as good/fast/clever a worker as someone without the handicap, which just isn't the case. someone who isn't dyslexic is obviously going to be able to read faster and thus process data faster, for example, but due to the way exams are done the qualifications of the two employees won't necessarily show this. which defeats the point of qualifications.
rock music is kewl

Share this topic:


  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users