Page 1 of 1
Gibson vs Fender
#1
Posted 10 October 2005 - 03:42 PM
which type of guitar do you prefer?
i'll say Gibson, i don't play guitar but i think Les Paul's and SG's are really cool
i'll say Gibson, i don't play guitar but i think Les Paul's and SG's are really cool
No longer posting.
#3
Posted 10 October 2005 - 03:55 PM
both suck imo. fender have bland designs, are pretty average in most aspects and are generally pretty boring. gibsons are heavy, overpriced, have fat necks, and are hard to play. they rely on their brand too much.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
#6
Posted 14 October 2005 - 11:13 PM
Eh Tommy, on Oct 10 2005, 05:55 PM, said:
both suck imo. fender have bland designs, are pretty average in most aspects and are generally pretty boring. gibsons are heavy, overpriced, have fat necks, and are hard to play. they rely on their brand too much.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
your too critical
fretwizard, on Oct 10 2005, 10:44 PM, said:
I hate Gibson, its a fat mans guitar!
hey man slash,zakk wylde,my bro,me,joe perry n mr.gibson himself r not fat men!but ur cool
#7
Posted 15 October 2005 - 02:54 AM
headrush fuckin rock, on Oct 15 2005, 01:13 AM, said:
Eh Tommy, on Oct 10 2005, 05:55 PM, said:
both suck imo. fender have bland designs, are pretty average in most aspects and are generally pretty boring. gibsons are heavy, overpriced, have fat necks, and are hard to play. they rely on their brand too much.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
i chose gibson but i should have chosen fender, i prefer playing on fenders. i still dont like them.
your too critical
hey, i'm not too critical but i have a good idea of what i want in a guitar. i have played those guitars and i didnt like them.
anyway thats just for me, hence i wrote 'imo'. i'm sure there are people that like the low frets, fat neck and their designs.
one thing that i definitely think is true no matter what is that they are overpriced.
#8
Posted 17 October 2005 - 11:39 PM
Way overpriced...... I dont like either of em really though i hav an SG so id hav to say gibson
Victims, aren't we all?
#9
Posted 17 October 2005 - 11:59 PM
I'd say Gibson, but only for the SG, which is unlike most of their others in terms of design, especially the neck, and for the pre-1960s 335s and Charlie Christionson style guitars.
#10
Posted 18 October 2005 - 05:22 PM
i love gibsons n epiphones.they rock.but still say they are all overpriced.i got a gibo zakk wylde they rock
#11
Posted 18 October 2005 - 05:30 PM
i would say Gibson is a better a guitar, they have a good designs very stylish.
Lets start a mosh-pit
#12
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:08 AM
Great article I've ever seen. I also come accross such kind of experience and was really at a loss. After reading your post, i take a tumble suddenly. Thanks for your sharing with us. I will follow you if you contuniue to give such useful one. Again many thanks!e/p transducer,i/p transducer electro pneumatic transducer,electro pneumatic converter,air pressure regulator air regulator,erw pipe,hot dipped galvanized pipe,women purse wholesale,tiffany necklace,tiffany wholesale,juicy bracelet,links of london I will follow you continuously.Suppot you!Thank you very much!Since I am engaged in the business of if you can write something about that
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help




















