Music Piracy the master debate
#1
Posted 15 April 2005 - 09:33 AM
I think pretty much everyone here does; even those that don't download music have borrowed and then copied/taped CD's off their mates.
What impact do you think music piracy has had on the artists you love?
Is the alternative to piracy (paying for the music you listen for) really out of your budget?
#2
Posted 15 April 2005 - 02:39 PM
#3
Posted 15 April 2005 - 05:30 PM
#4
Posted 15 April 2005 - 06:18 PM
also i've downloaded some songs and as a result ended up seeing the band live so i don't think that the act is wholley evil
#5
Posted 15 April 2005 - 07:06 PM
#6
Posted 15 April 2005 - 11:52 PM
Quote
#7
Posted 16 April 2005 - 01:38 PM
Also, does sending a friend a song over MSN count in the whole illegaly thing? Even if they got it off a cd?
This post has been edited by Forgone Conclusion: 16 April 2005 - 01:39 PM
#9
Posted 16 April 2005 - 04:47 PM
i used to download loads of music illegally, ive even downloaded entire discographies of bands in the past, including iron maiden, symphony x, iced earth, bodom, sonata arctica etc etc
after a while i realised that the pleasure buying a cd, getting home then hearing it on my stereo while reading the lyric book was so much more than that of hearing a downloaded track on the computer. it also feels much better to own the cd with the artwork, lyrics etc. ive since stopped downloading, an bought all good albums i had downloaded in the past. its not like im doing it for morals/principles or whatever, i just like owning these albums.
but i do download single tracks occasionally to check out artists/albums, although i more often just look at reviews in order to decide what cds to buy.
also i'll download an album if theres no way for me to buy it. for example john petrucci's solo album is only available in the US, from his website, i could get it shipped but firstly that wud cost a lot and secondly i dont have a credit card that they accept. but i'll definitely buy it if it comes out in the UK. this also applies for bootlegs that arent on sale to the general public.
#10
Posted 16 April 2005 - 10:59 PM
i think that says something
#11
Posted 17 April 2005 - 11:40 AM
I would also like to point out that while record c ompanies have been whingeing about loss of sales etc, over the past couple of years they have been higher than ever before
#12
Posted 17 April 2005 - 12:04 PM
Forgone Conclusion, on Apr 17 2005, 01:40 PM, said:
Are you sure? I find that pretty hard to believe.
#13
Posted 17 April 2005 - 03:05 PM
#15
Posted 17 April 2005 - 08:56 PM
#16
Posted 17 April 2005 - 09:43 PM
Cue for someone with too much time on their hands to research the figures?
Ahem, that'd be me in a week's time.

tKatKa single 'Lazerslab' out now! Click here to get involved...
#18
Posted 17 April 2005 - 11:22 PM
Quote
So I'd guess profits are down - £3.50 for a single, £12 for an entire album; but album sales have risen 21% in five years
my interpretation - you hear a single on the radio, instead of buying it, we now download it. singles sales down. But you get into the artist, download a few more songs, decide to buy the album. Album sales get a massive boost.
Singles sales will rise again with the download phenomenon, as soon as the industry can get more women on the internet to join men in the (legal) downloading phenomenon:
Quote
#19
Posted 18 April 2005 - 04:02 PM
Quote
You are correct. I was including internet music sales in that comment. CD sales have been down, but the internet has by far made up for it, with plenty of middle-aged men buying all the songs they had on records when they were wee, which conveniently explains the 96% men thing
#20
Posted 18 April 2005 - 07:00 PM
BeefXcore19
1OvDaLadz212

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help




















